hong_kong_pharmacy_conference

Evaluation Form

It would be greatly appreciated if you could fill out this evaluation form at the end of the conference in order to assist us in planning for the Conference in 2025. Your valuable comments will guide us to a marvelous conference in the year 2025 to come!

Day 1: 24 February 2024 (Saturday)

1. Theme Speech 1: Strategic Purchasing – What Does It Mean in Future Pharmaceutical Service Models?

How relevant was the speech to you? *

1 (Not at all)	2	3	4	5 (Very relevant)
1 (Not at all)Item #1 1 (Not at all)	2Item #1 2	3Item #1 3	4Item #1 4	5 (Very relevant)Item #1 5 (Very relevant)

How useful was the message? *

1 (Not at all)	2	3	4	5 (Very relevant)
1 (Not at all)Item #1 1 (Not at all)	2Item #1 2	3Item #1 3	4Item #1 4	5 (Very relevant)Item #1 5 (Very relevant)

Comment:

2. Theme Speech 2: Advancing Comprehensive Medication Management Services in U.S. Community Settings

How relevant was the speech to you? *

1 (Not at all)	2	3	4	5 (Very relevant)
1 (Not at all)Item #1 1 (Not at all)	2Item #1 2	3Item #1 3	4Item #1 4	5 (Very relevant)Item #1 5 (Very relevant)

How useful was the message? *

1 (Not at all)	2	3	4	5 (Very relevant)
1 (Not at all)Item #1 1 (Not at all)	2Item #1 2	3Item #1 3	4Item #1 4	5 (Very relevant)Item #1 5 (Very relevant)

Comment:

3. Theme Speech 3: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of HealthCare

How relevant was the speech to you? *

1 (Not at all)	2	3	4	5 (Very relevant)
1 (Not at all)Item #1 1 (Not at all)	2Item #1 2	3Item #1 3	4Item #1 4	5 (Very relevant)Item #1 5 (Very relevant)

How useful was the message? *

1 (Not at all)	2	3	4	5 (Very relevant)
1 (Not at all)Item #1 1 (Not at all)	2Item #1 2	3Item #1 3	4Item #1 4	5 (Very relevant)Item #1 5 (Very relevant)

Comment:

4. Theme Speech 4: Latest Development in Drug Regulatory Enhancement in Hong Kong

How relevant was the speech to you? *

1 (Not at all)	2	3	4	5 (Very relevant)
1 (Not at all)Item #1 1 (Not at all)	2Item #1 2	3Item #1 3	4Item #1 4	5 (Very relevant)Item #1 5 (Very relevant)

How useful was the message? *

1 (Not at all)	2	3	4	5 (Very relevant)
1 (Not at all)Item #1 1 (Not at all)	2Item #1 2	3Item #1 3	4Item #1 4	5 (Very relevant)Item #1 5 (Very relevant)

Comment:

Day 2: 25 February 2024 (Sunday)

1. Concurrent Session 1

Which session did you choose? *

I: Innovation & Technology – Designing and Implementing a Virtual Cardiac Hospital in the Home Pharmacy Service: An Innovative Approach
II: Advancement in Drug Regulation – Worldwide Landscape on Principles and Regulatory Evaluation
III: Oral Presentations

Did the speech meet your expectation? *

Yes
No

How useful was the message? *

1 (Not at all)	2	3	4	5 (Very useful)
1 (Not at all)Item #1 1 (Not at all)	2Item #1 2	3Item #1 3	4Item #1 4	5 (Very useful)Item #1 5 (Very useful)

Comment:

2. Concurrent Session 2

Which session did you choose? *

I: Innovation & Technology – Artificial Intelligence in Pharmacy: From Discovery to Whole Person Care
II: Advancement in Drug Regulation – Overview on Drug Evaluation Mechanism in Singapore
III: Oral Presentations

Did the speech meet your expectation? *

Yes
No

How useful was the message? *

1 (Not at all)	2	3	4	5 (Very useful)
1 (Not at all)Item #1 1 (Not at all)	2Item #1 2	3Item #1 3	4Item #1 4	5 (Very useful)Item #1 5 (Very useful)

Comment:

3. Concurrent Session 3

Which topic did you choose? *

I: Innovation & Technology – Future Pharmacy and Artificial Intelligence
II: Advancement in Drug Regulation – HK Regulatory Affairs Landscape – A Journey from the Past to the Future
III: Oral Presentation

Did the speech meet your expectation? *

Yes
No

How useful was the message? *

1 (Not at all)	2	3	4	5 (Very useful)
1 (Not at all)Item #1 1 (Not at all)	2Item #1 2	3Item #1 3	4Item #1 4	5 (Very useful)Item #1 5 (Very useful)

Comment:

4. Concurrent Session 4

Which topic did you choose? *

I: Clinical Evidence Application – Diagnostic and Clinical Needs for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antimicrobials
II: Primary HealthCare – District Health Centre Update: Co-care Model
III: Application of Advanced Therapy – Clinical Application of CAR-T Cell Therapy: Promises & Challenges

Did the speech meet your expectation? *

Yes
No

How useful was the message? *

1 (Not at all)	2	3	4	5 (Very useful)
1 (Not at all)Item #1 1 (Not at all)	2Item #1 2	3Item #1 3	4Item #1 4	5 (Very useful)Item #1 5 (Very useful)

Comment:

5. Concurrent Session 5

Which topic did you choose? *

I: Clinical Evidence Application – How Do I Adapt the Guidelines. Yet Individualize My Patient’s Care?
II: Primary HealthCare – Embracing the Diversified Service Models of the Community Pharmacy in Hong Kong
III: Application of Advanced Therapy – Gene Therapy for Neurological Disorders and Experience in Hong Kong

Did the speech meet your expectation?

Yes
No

How useful was the message? *

1 (Not at all)	2	3	4	5 (Very useful)
1 (Not at all)Item #1 1 (Not at all)	2Item #1 2	3Item #1 3	4Item #1 4	5 (Very useful)Item #1 5 (Very useful)

Comment:

6. Concurrent Session 6

Which topic did you choose? *

I: Clinical Evidence Application – Leveraging Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patient Registries for Enhanced Real-World Evidence
II: Primary HealthCare – Reimagine the Potential Pharmacist Development in Hong Kong: The Perspective from a Non-Governmental Organization
III: Application of Advanced Therapy – Opportunities and Challenges in Developing Engineered Osteochondral Tissue (eOCT) towards Tissue Engineering-based Advanced therapeutic Products (ATPs)

Did the speech meet your expectation? *

Yes
No

How useful was the message? *

1 (Not at all)	2	3	4	5 (Very useful)
1 (Not at all)Item #1 1 (Not at all)	2Item #1 2	3Item #1 3	4Item #1 4	5 (Very useful)Item #1 5 (Very useful)

Comment:

7. Concurrent Session 7

Which topic did you choose? *

I: Innovative Service Model – Scope of Services in Rheumatology Clinical and Practical Tips on Patient Assessment
II: Ambulatory Care Services – Low Risk and High Reward: Outpatient Allergy De-labeling Opportunities
III: GBA Development – Hospital Accreditation Updates in the Greater Bay Area

Did the speech meet your expectation? *

Yes
No

How useful was the message? *

1 (Not at all)	2	3	4	5 (Very useful)
1 (Not at all)Item #1 1 (Not at all)	2Item #1 2	3Item #1 3	4Item #1 4	5 (Very useful)Item #1 5 (Very useful)

Comment:

8. Concurrent Session 8

Which topic did you choose? *

I: Innovative Service Model – Evaluating the Impact of Advanced Practice Pharmacists Providing CMM on Healthcare Quality, Cost, and Patient and Physician Satisfaction
II: Ambulatory Care Services – Penicillin Allergy De-labelling on the Fast Track: A Pharmacist-led Clinic in a Teaching Hospital of Hong Kong
III: GBA Development – Meeting the Unmet Needs: The Innovative Role of Surgical Pharmacist

Did the speech meet your expectation? *

Yes
No

How useful was the message? *

1 (Not at all)	2	3	4	5 (Very useful)
1 (Not at all)Item #1 1 (Not at all)	2Item #1 2	3Item #1 3	4Item #1 4	5 (Very useful)Item #1 5 (Very useful)

Comment:

9. Concurrent Session 9

Which topic did you choose? *

I: Innovative Service Model – Local Pharmacist Service Sharing: Heart Failure Clinic
II: Ambulatory Care Services – Practical Skin Testing Workshop for Pharmacist
III: GBA Development – Illustration of Surgical Pharmacist’s Role by Case Sharing

Did the speech meet your expectation? *

Yes
No

How useful was the message? *

1 (Not at all)	2	3	4	5 (Very useful)
1 (Not at all)Item #1 1 (Not at all)	2Item #1 2	3Item #1 3	4Item #1 4	5 (Very useful)Item #1 5 (Very useful)

Comment:

10. Panel Discussion: Reimagine the Opportunities and Challenges in Pharmacy

Did the panel discussion meet your expectation? *

Yes
No

How useful was the message? *

1 (Not at all)	2	3	4	5 (Very useful)
1 (Not at all)Item #1 1 (Not at all)	2Item #1 2	3Item #1 3	4Item #1 4	5 (Very useful)Item #1 5 (Very useful)

Comment:

11. Please rate your level of satisfaction in the following aspects.*

Overall quality of meeting *

1 (Very unsatisfied)	2	3	4	5 (Very satisfied)
1 (Very unsatisfied)Item #1 1 (Very unsatisfied)	2Item #1 2	3Item #1 3	4Item #1 4	5 (Very satisfied)Item #1 5 (Very satisfied)

Format of meeting *

1 (Very unsatisfied)	2	3	4	5 (Very satisfied)
1 (Very unsatisfied)Item #1 1 (Very unsatisfied)	2Item #1 2	3Item #1 3	4Item #1 4	5 (Very satisfied)Item #1 5 (Very satisfied)

Timing of the meeting *

1 (Very unsatisfied)	2	3	4	5 (Very satisfied)
1 (Very unsatisfied)Item #1 1 (Very unsatisfied)	2Item #1 2	3Item #1 3	4Item #1 4	5 (Very satisfied)Item #1 5 (Very satisfied)

12. Which aspect did you like most about the conference? *

13. Suggestions for next year Conference (seminar topics, speakers, programmes etc): *

14. How did you know about the conference? (you can choose more than one) *

E-mails/publications of your institutions (please specify:) *

Others: *

~~ Thank you for your feedback ~~